Bonus vs Commission: Which Incentive Structure Is Right for Your Sales Team?

May 19, 2023
Diya Mathur
Diya Mathur
Diya Mathur
Decorative image: Aesthetic background with abstract shapes and colors.

Table Of Contents

In the world of sales, motivation and performance are key factors that determine the success of any team. 

To drive sales and encourage top-notch results, it is crucial to establish effective incentive structures. 

When it comes to sales team roles, two popular options for incentive plans are bonuses and commissions, each offering distinct advantages and considerations. It is crucial to comprehend the disparities between these two incentive structures in order to choose the most suitable option for your sales team.

In this blog, we’ll explore the ‘bonus vs commissions’ debate and try to understand which one might be the best fit for your organization.

Understanding Bonuses:

A bonus is a one-time reward given to an employee for achieving specific goals or milestones. 

It is typically a fixed amount or a percentage of the employee's base salary.

Bonuses can be tied to individual, team, or company-wide objectives, such as meeting sales objectives, exceeding revenue goals, or launching a new product successfully.

Advantages of Bonuses:

Advantages of Bonuses
  1. Flexibility: Bonuses allow management to set specific criteria for performance evaluation and reward sales representatives accordingly. This flexibility enables you to align bonuses with your business objectives and adapt them as needed.
  2. Motivation for non-sales roles: Bonuses can be extended to employees in non-sales roles who contribute to the overall success of the sales team. This can foster a sense of collaboration and motivate cross-functional teams to support the sales effort.
  3. Rewarding team efforts: Bonuses can incentivize teamwork and cooperation. By linking bonuses to team goals, you encourage collaboration and foster a supportive work environment.

Considerations for Bonuses:

  1. Short-term motivation: Bonuses often serve as short-term motivators, providing immediate gratification for achieving specific targets. However, they may not sustain long-term performance improvement or maintain consistent motivation throughout the year.
  2. Fixed costs: Bonuses represent a fixed cost to the organization. Allocating budget for bonuses can be challenging, especially during periods of financial constraints or when performance goals are not met.

Understanding Commissions:

Commissions are a form of variable compensation directly tied to the sales representative's performance. 

Salespeople earn a percentage of the revenue they generate or the value of the products they sell. 

Commissions are commonly used in industries with direct sales, such as real estate, insurance, and retail. One notable advantage of commissions is their scalability, aligning with business growth and ensuring a continuous stream of recurring revenue examples for sales representatives, especially in industries with subscription-based models.

Advantages of Commissions:

  1. Performance-driven: Commissions directly link earnings to sales performance, providing a strong incentive for sales representatives to exceed targets and maximize their income. This structure encourages a results-oriented approach and rewards top performers accordingly.
  2. Scalability: In terms of sales compensation plans, commissions have the ability to align with business growth since sales representatives earn higher payouts as they generate increased revenues. This aspect makes commissions particularly well-suited for businesses with ambitious growth plans.
  3. Cost control: Effective sales commission accounting is crucial in maintaining accurate financial records and ensuring transparency. By diligently tracking commission payouts in relation to revenue generated, organizations can not only manage costs efficiently but also gain insights into sales performance, individual contributions, and overall profitability. This comprehensive approach enables businesses to align their financial strategies with sales objectives and make informed decisions to optimize their commission structures for maximum revenue growth.

Considerations for Commissions:

  1. Individual focus: Individual incentives in commission structures tend to place a strong emphasis on individual contributions. While this approach can foster healthy competition, it may also result in a less collaborative environment among team members.
  2. Commission-only structure: A commission-only structure can attract highly motivated individuals who thrive on the potential for high earnings. However, it may limit the pool of candidates, as some individuals prefer a more stable base salary.

The difference between Bonuses and Commissions:


  • Bonus: Bonuses can be awarded to employees across different roles and departments within a company. The eligibility criteria for receiving a bonus may vary, and it can be based on individual, team, or company-wide performance.
  • Commission: Commission is typically offered to employees in sales roles or those directly involved in revenue generation. It is usually tied to specific sales targets or quotas that need to be met in order to receive commission payments.


  • Bonus: Bonuses can be awarded at various times throughout the year, depending on the company's policies and practices. They can be given annually, quarterly, or even as one-time bonuses for exceptional performance or achievements.
  • Commission: Commission is typically earned and paid out on a more regular basis, often monthly or quarterly. It is directly linked to the sales generated during a specific period.

Payment Frequency:

  • Bonuses: Bonuses can be awarded on various schedules, depending on the organization's policies and practices. Some companies provide bonuses annually, while others may offer them quarterly, semi-annually, or on special occasions. 
  • Commissions: Commissions are usually paid on a more frequent basis than bonuses since they are directly tied to sales activities. The payment frequency for commissions can vary, but it is often monthly or quarterly to provide timely rewards for sales efforts.

It's important to note that the specific policies and practices regarding bonuses and commissions can vary between different organizations and industries. 

Finding the Right Fit for Your Sales Team:

Finding the Right Fit for Your Sales Team

When deciding between bonuses vs commissions, it's essential to consider the specific dynamics of your sales team and organization. Here are a few key factors to consider:

  1. Sales Structure: Assess your sales structure and determine if it aligns better with a bonus or commission system, impacting your sales team's OTE compensation. If your sales process involves large, complex deals that require significant time and effort, a commission-based system might be more suitable. On the other hand, if your sales involve smaller, recurring transactions or team-based efforts, a bonus system could be more effective.
  2. Sales Cycle Length: Consider the length of your sales cycle. If your sales cycle is longer, it may take a considerable amount of time before commission-based rewards are realized. In such cases, a combination of base salary and periodic bonuses may be more motivating for your sales team.
  3. Motivation and Performance: Evaluate how bonuses and commissions can impact motivation and performance. Some salespeople thrive on the competitive nature of commissions and may be more driven to achieve targets. Others may be more motivated by the immediate gratification of bonuses tied to specific milestones or achievements. Understanding the preferences and motivations of your sales team can help you make an informed decision.
  4. Financial Impact: Assessing the financial impact of bonuses and commissions on your organization is a crucial aspect of sales performance management. Commission-based systems tie rewards directly to sales performance, which can be financially advantageous when sales are high. By closely monitoring and analyzing the correlation between incentives and sales outcomes, sales performance management allows businesses to fine-tune their compensation structures and ensure that the reward systems align with strategic goals, motivating sales teams to achieve optimal results consistently.)

    However, during slower periods or when sales targets are not met, it can place additional financial strain on the organization. Bonuses, on the other hand, can provide more predictable and controlled expenses, but they may not provide the same level of direct alignment with sales outcomes.
  5. Team Dynamics: Consider the impact on team dynamics and collaboration. Commissions, particularly when individually focused, can sometimes create a more competitive and potentially less collaborative environment. If teamwork and collaboration are crucial to your sales process, you may want to lean towards a bonus system that encourages collective effort and shared success.
  6. Industry and Market Norms: Research industry and market norms to understand what compensation structures are commonly used. It's important to strike a balance between being competitive and aligning with industry standards while also considering what works best for your specific sales team and organization.

Ultimately, the decision between using bonuses vs commissions should be based on a comprehensive understanding of your sales team, organizational dynamics, and objectives. 

You may also consider a combination of both approaches, tailoring the structure to incentivize the desired behaviors and outcomes. 

Regularly reviewing and fine-tuning your compensation structure based on feedback and performance data, often facilitated by a robust sales monitoring system, can help optimize the effectiveness of your sales incentive system.

To know more about how Incentive Compensation management can help you build a data-driven strategy designed to win, book a demo with us!


Diya Mathur

Diya is a Product Marketing Associate and content writer specializing in Incentive Compensation Automation. Diya has honed her ability to bridge the gap between intricate software functionalities and accessible, reader-friendly content. Her articles are a testament to her dedication to breaking down intricate SaaS solutions into digestible insights that cater to both tech-savvy professionals and those new to the software landscape.